Tree / connection is the key

Written something every day

I want to have written something every day. Because I like doing it. Making something. I don’t want to explain why I like it, because it just is. It feels like I have to justify myself. This is how science feels to me: as if there always has to be an explanation for everything.

The explanation is that I just enjoy doing it, I like doing it, and that’s the whole explanation. As soon as I have to explain why I like making something, why it gives me a certain feeling, it doesn’t work for me anymore. Then it becomes ‘a thing’, and I don’t want it to be ‘a thing’.

Even when someone says, “I always like doodling on paper,” that’s already too much for me, because then it’s ‘a thing’. To have an opinion about it is to think about it, and thinking about it is exactly what I don’t do when I’m creating. Both in science and in the rest of the world, there are people who only have opinions about things or try to explain why things work the way they do, but that’s not how the world works for me at all.

If I say, “I just do it,” that’s as close as I can get to what I mean. As if I were just playing football in a square. This text, for example: no matter what you think of it, I haven’t thought for a second about what I’m typing right now. The words just come and keep coming. Maybe I’ll shuffle a few things around here and there – and then that voice pops up again: “Is this good enough? Are you wandering too far? The soul is going out of your story.”

Fuck off.

"Thoughts happen in the background.
Let them drift off now and then."

When you look at a thought, it's like blowing on it.

And then it drifts left or right.

You can also put a bubble in it.

Just try it.

For example, maybe thoughts are made of the same stuff as quantum.

I Am Here to Sell You a Different Perspective on Life

Religion is the process of understanding that everything is perfect and exactly how it should be.

That doesn’t mean you can’t change things.

Let me elaborate with an example.

My uncle wasn’t feeling well. Something was wrong with his lungs. He went to the doctor, and the doctor told him he had COPD. From a medical perspective, this is an irregularity within the body.

But my uncle also used to smoke and work with paint. From a religious perspective, this is not an irregularity or something that proves the system isn’t functioning perfectly.

Both the medical view and the religious view can fully coexist—they emphasize different things.

Religion is, contrary to how it is often portrayed, extremely hardcore, with one hundred percent ownership of all your actions. So in the example of my uncle, religion would say: Why are you at the doctor’s office? You smoked and worked with paint. Your body is actually one hundred percent healthy. We should give your body a sticker for how well it’s functioning. But yes, you are going to die soon.

From a day-to-day psychological perspective, think about how big the shift is when you start to perceive that everything that should be here right now is here—including your pain, your anxiety, your self-doubt, down to every cell. The difference is enormous.

Learn Deep Learning and Think Multidimensionally — Without a Computer

Let’s take the simple sum:
1 + 1

From a mathematical perspective, the answer is 2.

But from other dimensions of thinking, this answer may not hold.

---

1. Identity Dimension

The left 1 is not the same as the right 1.
They exist in different positions, contexts, or even moments in time.
So when you use these 1s in another equation, information is lost — their uniqueness is ignored.

---

2. Shape Dimension

If you look only at the shapes of the symbols — the “1”s and the “+” — there is no inherent question or operation.
They are just forms, not functions.
Without interpretation, there is no sum.

---

3. Object Dimension

Now imagine 1 + 1 as real-world objects — say, apples.
You quickly run into deeper questions:

• Which apple are we starting with?
• Are the apples truly identical?
• Can two unique apples ever be summed as “2 apples” without losing their individuality?

In this dimension, context matters.
“1 + 1” is not just a number — it’s a story, a relationship, a transformation.